Liberty or freedom denotes a very importance principle of political philosophy, as humans are treated as rational creatures due to their ability of reasoning and the ability to classify between 'right' and 'wrong' for them and there society environment Liberty was regarded as a condition of human life. Liberty was derived from a Latin word "Liben" meaning free. John Stuart Mill in his essay "On Liberty " says "The only which deserves name is that pursuing our own good in our own way as long as we do not attempt to deprive adults of there efforts to obtain it." Where as equality which is alike Liberty, is a prominent political ideal of the present day world. Liberty and equality taken together, describe the condition of human emancipation. They constitutes the voice of the oppressed, the voice against injustice and the voice changing unfair social conditions. The modern idea of equality seek the reduction in inequalities in so far as they can be proved to be the unjust according to the prevailing social consciousness. It is much different then the definition given by Aristotle where he talks about justice as treating equals equally and unequal unequally. This was a typical statement in that it insisted on recognition and maintenance of existing inequalities in society between Master and slave, between rich and poor, between morally superior and morally inferior, and so on.
Talking about the relationship between liberty and equality liberty and equality are closely related to each other. There is no value of Liberty in the absence of equality. They are the same conditions viewed from different angle. They are the two sides of the same coin. Do there is a close relationship between liberty and equality, yet there are some political thinkers who do not find any relationship between liberty and equality. For example, Lord Acton and Tocqueville who were the ardent advocates of Liberty, found no relation between the two condition. To them liberty and equality were antagonistic and antithetical to each other. Lord Acton maintains that ”The passion fruit equality made vain the hope of Liberty". These people made of the opinion that humans where conferred inequality by nature.
These days, it is generally believed that liberty and equality should go together point if an individual is given unrestrained Liberty to do whatever likes comma he will cause harm to others. There will be chaos in society if individuals are given unrestrained Liberty point in the 19 century the individualist wrongly integrated the term Liberty Point they did not attack any importance to economic equality and late streets on Laissez-faire to be adopted by the government. Adam Smith was the ardent advocate of this view point the individual district mention that that should be free competition between the capitalist and labour leaders. They did not what the government to interfere in the economic matters. Formula of demand and supply should be adopted. All the economic difficulties will be removed by this formula. If there is excess of commodities and easy availability of labour, crisis will come down. If there is scarcity, prices will rise higher and higher. This formula was implemented in England and in many other European countries and the results where dangerous. The government lost its control over the capitalist. The capitalists exploited the opportunity to the full. They exploited the labour to the full. As a result of it, the rich grew rich and poor became poorer. Delivery class suffered tragically.
As a result of it, and intense relation to place against individualism. This relation led to the growth of socialism. Socialism condemned and refuted the principles of individualism. Liberty has no significance in the absence of economic equality. Professor Laski has very aptly remarked," Where are rich and poor educated and uneducated we always find the lesson of master and servant" point does it is quite clear that economic equality is essential for the existence of political freedom. Otherwise it will be capitalist democracy in which the labours will have the right to vote but they will not be able to get there purpose served. Therefore, Liberty in the real sense of word is possible only in social district democracy in which equality and liberty good together.
Similarly, it is also true that in the absence of political liberty, equality cannot be established." Equality, in all these forms, must always be", says Barker ," subjects and instrumental to the free development of capacity, but if it be raised to the length of uniformity and if uniformity be made to thwart the free development of capacity, the subject becomes the master and the world Topsy-Turvy". R.H. Tawney has rightly remarked, “A Lords music of equality, so far from being inimical to Liberty, is essential to it". Pollard also writes, " there is only one solution of the problem of Liberty. It lies in equality". Does, liberty and equality are complementary to each other. They are not authorised to each other. They go together.
Liberty and equality " are to be reconciled by remembering that both ( liberty and equality) or sub ordinate meaning to the end of releasing the potentialities of individual personality on the widest possible scale. The development of a rich variety of potentialities requires a large measure of liberty and forbid all attempts to impose a dead level of social and economic equality".
There is an interconnection between the two because all individual liberties are related to the basic equality of all men and because historical the aspiration for Liberty became in practice and destruction of privileged or inequality. Both are complementary to each other. " Liberty thus implies equalities", face Herbert A. Dean," liberty and equality are not in conflict not even separate but are different facts of the same Idea. Indeed since they are identical, there can be no problem how are to what extent they are or can be related; this surely the nearest is not the most satisfactory should ever devised 4 perennial problem in political philosophy".
Thus we can conclude by saying that the principle of Liberty stipulates 'equal' Liberty or freedom for everyone. Liberty and equality comprise the foundation of a just social order keeping behind the fact that the humans are unequal natural depending on their capability and their means of development. Does liberty and equality or both contradictory as well as complementary to each other.
Talking about the relationship between liberty and equality liberty and equality are closely related to each other. There is no value of Liberty in the absence of equality. They are the same conditions viewed from different angle. They are the two sides of the same coin. Do there is a close relationship between liberty and equality, yet there are some political thinkers who do not find any relationship between liberty and equality. For example, Lord Acton and Tocqueville who were the ardent advocates of Liberty, found no relation between the two condition. To them liberty and equality were antagonistic and antithetical to each other. Lord Acton maintains that ”The passion fruit equality made vain the hope of Liberty". These people made of the opinion that humans where conferred inequality by nature.
These days, it is generally believed that liberty and equality should go together point if an individual is given unrestrained Liberty to do whatever likes comma he will cause harm to others. There will be chaos in society if individuals are given unrestrained Liberty point in the 19 century the individualist wrongly integrated the term Liberty Point they did not attack any importance to economic equality and late streets on Laissez-faire to be adopted by the government. Adam Smith was the ardent advocate of this view point the individual district mention that that should be free competition between the capitalist and labour leaders. They did not what the government to interfere in the economic matters. Formula of demand and supply should be adopted. All the economic difficulties will be removed by this formula. If there is excess of commodities and easy availability of labour, crisis will come down. If there is scarcity, prices will rise higher and higher. This formula was implemented in England and in many other European countries and the results where dangerous. The government lost its control over the capitalist. The capitalists exploited the opportunity to the full. They exploited the labour to the full. As a result of it, the rich grew rich and poor became poorer. Delivery class suffered tragically.
As a result of it, and intense relation to place against individualism. This relation led to the growth of socialism. Socialism condemned and refuted the principles of individualism. Liberty has no significance in the absence of economic equality. Professor Laski has very aptly remarked," Where are rich and poor educated and uneducated we always find the lesson of master and servant" point does it is quite clear that economic equality is essential for the existence of political freedom. Otherwise it will be capitalist democracy in which the labours will have the right to vote but they will not be able to get there purpose served. Therefore, Liberty in the real sense of word is possible only in social district democracy in which equality and liberty good together.
Similarly, it is also true that in the absence of political liberty, equality cannot be established." Equality, in all these forms, must always be", says Barker ," subjects and instrumental to the free development of capacity, but if it be raised to the length of uniformity and if uniformity be made to thwart the free development of capacity, the subject becomes the master and the world Topsy-Turvy". R.H. Tawney has rightly remarked, “A Lords music of equality, so far from being inimical to Liberty, is essential to it". Pollard also writes, " there is only one solution of the problem of Liberty. It lies in equality". Does, liberty and equality are complementary to each other. They are not authorised to each other. They go together.
Liberty and equality " are to be reconciled by remembering that both ( liberty and equality) or sub ordinate meaning to the end of releasing the potentialities of individual personality on the widest possible scale. The development of a rich variety of potentialities requires a large measure of liberty and forbid all attempts to impose a dead level of social and economic equality".
There is an interconnection between the two because all individual liberties are related to the basic equality of all men and because historical the aspiration for Liberty became in practice and destruction of privileged or inequality. Both are complementary to each other. " Liberty thus implies equalities", face Herbert A. Dean," liberty and equality are not in conflict not even separate but are different facts of the same Idea. Indeed since they are identical, there can be no problem how are to what extent they are or can be related; this surely the nearest is not the most satisfactory should ever devised 4 perennial problem in political philosophy".
Thus we can conclude by saying that the principle of Liberty stipulates 'equal' Liberty or freedom for everyone. Liberty and equality comprise the foundation of a just social order keeping behind the fact that the humans are unequal natural depending on their capability and their means of development. Does liberty and equality or both contradictory as well as complementary to each other.
0 Comments